India-Mauritius Tax Treaty Overhaul Sparks Concern Among Foreign Investors

 India and Mauritius are in the process of reworking their Double Tax Avoidance Agreement (DTAA), triggering unease among foreign portfolio investors (FPIs). For decades, Mauritius has served as a preferred destination for foreign investment into India, offering advantageous tax treatment, particularly concerning capital gains. However, the proposed changes to the treaty signal a potential end to this tax haven status.

Historically, the India-Mauritius tax treaty, dating back to 1982, granted investors based in Mauritius significant tax benefits, particularly regarding capital gains. Under the agreement, capital gains were taxed at the source country, Mauritius, where the rate was effectively zero. This favorable tax regime persisted until 2016 when an amendment, effective from April 1, 2017, introduced taxation of capital gains in India for shares acquired after that date.

The recent amendment aims to align the treaty with international standards, notably the Multilateral Agreement on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS), aimed at ensuring multinational corporations pay taxes in the jurisdictions where they generate profits. Despite the 2016 changes, Mauritius retained its appeal, offering lower dividend tax rates (5% compared to India's 42% for high-net-worth individuals), tax-free dividends, and similar advantages for interest and royalties. However, with the introduction of the Principal Purpose Test (PPT), intended to prevent tax evasion, the treaty's benefits may erode if India suspects misuse.

Investors are concerned that the proposed changes could subject their investments to heightened scrutiny, potentially undermining the tax advantages they once enjoyed. Of particular concern is the absence of "grandfathering" provisions to protect existing investments, raising fears that tax authorities could retroactively scrutinize past deals.

Despite assurances from the Finance Ministry urging investors not to panic, uncertainty looms until the finalization of the amendment. The potential impact on mergers and acquisitions (M&A) deals is significant. Previously, buyers could rely on the tax treaty to mitigate capital gains tax risks, but the new amendment may prompt them to adopt a more cautious approach, potentially complicating negotiations and necessitating stronger indemnity clauses.

Furthermore, the uncertainty surrounding the application of the Principal Purpose Test could deter investment in India, particularly in the private equity sector, where exits are crucial for returns. Without clarity and protection for existing investments, investors may hesitate to commit capital, fearing adverse tax implications down the line.

In conclusion, the proposed changes to the India-Mauritius tax treaty have sent shockwaves through the investor community, raising concerns about the future of foreign investment in India and its broader implications for cross-border transactions.